Saturday 20 October, 5.15pm until 6.30pm, Frobisher Auditorium 2 After the Riots
The UK riots of last summer had a certain unreality about them. They took the nation by horrible surprise as youths trashed their own neighbourhoods, reviving talk of a ‘broken society’. Yet in their immediate aftermath, as the ‘clean-up’ campaigns got to work, our faith in the future of community was apparently restored. ‘Pop-up’ groups of residents appeared unprompted on the streets almost before the smoke had cleared, armed with brooms to clean up the mess (although they went their separate ways almost as quickly as the rioters). Even if we don’t know our neighbours, we can at least do a bit of neighbourhood networking with a view to ‘shoring up community resilience’, said one organiser of the clean-up. But surely we need something more than this if communities are to deal with or even prevent the kind of breakdown witnessed in London, Birmingham and Manchester last summer? So is the much-derided Big Society a match for the problems highlighted by the riots?
Communities secretary Eric Pickles affirmed the government’s desire to shift from a ‘Whitehall-dictated’ approach to one of putting ‘neighbourhoods in control’. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the RSA, wants to see citizens who are ‘more engaged, and more self-reliant’. But like most advocates of such a shift, Taylor believes it is up to the state to foster this new, engaged and active citizen. One RSA programme, working with a local authority, is seeking to modify people’s behaviour, making them less anti-social and drug-dependent, and encouraging them to recycle and grow their own vegetables. But even if we reject such a top-down approach, do the riots suggest the Big Society has to mean more than just letting us get on with it? Tottenham MP David Lammy caused something of a stir by suggesting government interference in how parents raise their children had been a factor in the riots: people ‘no longer feel sovereign in their own homes’, he complained. How do we make a reality of the notion of autonomous individuals taking control of their communities, when even their ability to take care of their own families is in question? How do we build a sense of community that lasts longer than it took for the riots to happen and for the shell-shocked residents to put away their brooms?
Listen to session audio:
Download mp3 (Right-click and choose “Save link as”)
director, Social Spaces; editor, Hand Made: portraits of emergent new community culture
co-editor The Future of Community; contributor to SocietyGuardian and Huffington Post; public and community sector consultant; convenor, IoI Social Policy Forum
founder, Networked Neighbourhoods
managing director, ResPublica Trust; co-author, Clubbing Together: The hidden wealth of communities
director, Generation Youth Issues; board member, Play Scotland
Too often government tries toDave Clements, Independent Voices, 30 September 2012
Pop-ups events are becoming a very important part of our work. The reason is that bringing things to life in a visible tangible form is a very exciting thing to do.Collaborate, 30 August 2012
Do Working Men’s Clubs hold their own key to survival, asks Ruth CherringtonRuth Cherrington, ResPublica, 17 August 2012
Despite the increasing importance of social networks, community development needs to take place both on and offlineRosie Niven, Guardian, 8 December 2011
Gang culture’ is almost entirely the imaginary creation of a political elite which prefers to fantasise that urban implosion is a product of gang conspiracies, rather than face up to the harsh reality that the riots were triggered by the twin crises of community solidarity and state authority.Brendan O'Neill, spiked, 23 August 2011