Sunday 31 October, 5.30pm until 6.30pm, Lecture Theatre 2
The appointment of Carol Ann Duffy – well known from her place on the curriculum - as Laureate, and the controversies over the election of the Oxford Professor of Poetry, have kept the sullen art in the headlines. Christopher Reid picked up the 2009 Costa Book of the Year for his collection A Scattering, while Bright Star saw John Keats join Dylan Thomas, Allan Ginsberg and Sylvia Plath as recent stars of the big screen. Poetry performances are increasingly popular at music festivals and at gigs, and pop stars such as Mike Scott (of Waterboys fame) and Rufus Wainwright have even recorded musical interpretations of WB Yeats and Shakespeare’s sonnets.
Yet increasingly it feels as if poetry’s renaissance is built on a constant rebranding to make poetry relevant to our daily lives. Last year Andrew Motion accused Britain’s schools of patronising students by failing to challenge them with poetry which wasn’t ‘a poem about football for a football loving boy, a rap for a fan of Eminem’. Yet he himself famously wrote a ‘Birthday Rap’ for Prince William. Similarly, while many others praise the therapeutic qualities of poetry in helping us cope with the stresses of the hectic, 24-7 modern world, some recoil when poems such as Duffy’s ‘Education for Leisure’ have an apparently more disturbing message.
Where can we draw a line between opening up difficult and complex works of literature to an unfamiliar audience, and simply being patronising? Is seeking relevance a response to the challenge to ‘make it new’ for another generation, or does it risk losing some of the original value and meaning? In a climate where so much of academia and education is encouraged to demonstrate its ‘impact’, can or should poetry justify itself? What is poetry for and how should it be taught?
Listen to session audio:
poet; novelist; author, Pessimism for Beginners and A Room Swept White
writer, broadcaster and cultural commentator
coordinator, Civitas Supplementary Schools Project, Yorkshire; co-organiser, Leeds Salon
|Dr George Szirtes|
reader in creative writing, UEA; poet; editor; translator; author, The Burning of the Books and Other Poems
associate director, Institute of Ideas
Efforts to make education more 'relevant' to black people can be both patronising and harmful. The western literary canon should be taught to everyoneLindsay Johns, Prospect, 23 September 2010
How seriously are we to take the meaning of poetry? What are the costs of seeing poetry as largely spontaneous and self-expressive?George Watson, Times Higher Education, 30 July 2010
What is poetry for? Who is it for? And can it really be on the ascendant?Stephen Moss, Guardian, 19 June 2010
Performance poetry conjures up images of po-faced writers declaiming depressing verse. Could a young collective bring some humour to the spoken word?Holly Williams, Independent, 19 January 2010
Schools should teach their pupils about more than just football poems and raps in poetry lessons, Sir Andrew Motion said today.Richard Garner, Independent, 8 January 2010
An examination board’s ban on Carol Ann Duffy’s ‘Education for Leisure’ is a stab in the back for liberal education.Michele Ledda, spiked, 11 December 2009
George Szirtes, Bloodaxe Books, 10 September 2009
Sophie Hannah, Carcanet Press, 29 November 2007
Capitalism What Is it Good For? - Sanjaya Baru
"Of all the political and cultural festivals, none beats the Battle of Ideas for its eclecticism and willingness to invite controversial and absorbing debate."
John Kampfner, Chief executive, Index on Censorship; former editor, New Statesman