Sunday 1 November, 1.45pm until 3.15pm, Upper Gulbenkian Gallery Keynote Controversies
Critics used to be feared and respected for their ability to make definitive judgements on everything from conceptual art to catwalk fashions. This mattered not just for the success – or failure – of the individuals being judged, but for shaping culture more generally. Critical acclaim for 18th-century actor David Garrick changed how we viewed Shakespeare as well as actors. Hazlitt was Romanticism’s critical muse, while Kenneth Tynan championed the post-war realism of plays like John Osborne’s Look Back In Anger. It could even be said that criticism makes us who we are, forming, as Roger Scruton puts it, ‘part of the great transition from youthful enjoyment to adult discrimination’. Today criticism can still – sometimes literally – define our tastes, with the Evening Standard’s Fay Maschler described as the ‘most feared and respected restaurant critic’ in London.
But society often seems to have disavowed its critics today, particularly where high culture is concerned. If anything, tough criticism is less associated with the arts than lifestyle journalism and light entertainment, from Fay Maschler to Simon Cowell. Some fear the dearth of in-depth critical writing reflects something deeper. With teachers wary of criticising students lest they damage their self-esteem, and professional journalism giving way to amateur blogging, are we the midst of a crisis of judgement? From politics to pop, some argue robust debate has collapsed to be replaced by a culture in which everybody’s opinions must be respected.
Are we no longer comfortable with criticism and authority today? Who needs a coterie of ‘official’ critics when anybody can publish a blog or write a reader’s review? Is this a liberating democratisation, empowering the man and woman in the street? How can we refine our own judgement without a wider culture of criticism? Do we risk reducing critical clarity to a competing cacophony of unexamined prejudices? Isn’t a society that is afraid to make critical judgements one that surrenders to paralysis and puerility? What is the role of the critic and why should we listen?
Listen to the session audio…
Other formats are available here
|Dr Ronan McDonald|
senior lecturer, English, University of Reading; author, The Death of the Critic
|Dr Munira Mirza|
deputy mayor, education and culture, Greater London Authority; author, The Politics of Culture: the case for universalism
novelist, East Fortune; film-maker, Powerhouses and My Father; artistic director, Bath Literature Festival
cellist, broadcaster and arts commentator
Dr Tiffany Jenkins
sociologist and cultural commentator
The decline of criticism is not democratising: it threatens the development of culture itself.Tiffany Jenkins, Times Higher Education, 31 October 2009
The Arts Council is recruiting 150 theatregoers to help them make funding decisions. But can we rely on their reports?Lyn Gardner, Guardian Unlimited, 10 September 2009
Is art criticism so easy that a pigeon can do it?Morgan Meis, The Smart Set, 26 August 2009
Mindless, clichéd, indiscriminate cheerleading is the last thing classical music needs just now, as it finds itself increasingly challenged to prove its relevance in the multicultural, anti-elitist, pop-saturated arts climate of the 21st century.James Oestreich, New York Times, 10 August 2009
The sciences aim to explain the world: they build theories that are tested through experiment, and which describe the workings of nature and the deep connections between cause and effect. Nothing like that is true of the humanities.Roger Scruton, American Spectator, June 2009
In an age of book clubs, celebrity endorsements and Internet bloggers, what role is there now for the professional critic as an arbiter of artistic value? Are literature and the arts only a question of personal taste?
Ronan McDonald, Continuum, 23 October 2008
The reviewer's trade has always enjoyed its teeth-baring and wound-licking moments of 'crisis', but this time there is real pain.Nick James, Sight and Sound, 1 October 2008
An army of arts bloggers is posting internet reviews on subjects from grand opera to soap opera - instant, global and free. US newspapers have begun to ditch their reviewers as digital alternatives flourish. Could it happen here?Jay Rayner, Observer, 13 July 2008
McDonald’s careful and engaged critique defends the idea of criticism through a historical discussion of the critics’ changing role, dealing on the way with the ‘democratisation’ of criticism aided by the internet, and its obscurantist elevation into self-reflection by post-structuralists.Michael Savage, Culture Wars, 21 January 2008
The critic is becoming a dandified copywriter, producing 'beautiful writing about beautiful objects and their beautiful makers’.JJ Charlesworth, spiked, 1 February 2005